Yes, Facts sink in. But they don’t matter.

Trump supporters know Trump lies. They just don’t care. A new study explains the psychological power — and hard limits — of fact-checking journalism. Brian Resnick Jul 10, 2017, 2:00pm EDT Fact-checking journalism kind of works. Getty Creative Images During the campaign — and into his presidency — Donald Trump repeatedly exaggerated and distorted crime … Continue reading Yes, Facts sink in. But they don’t matter.

Believing that one’s beliefs are superior is bipartisan.

Belief Superiority and Political Discord We can't all be right. Mark Leary Ph.D. American politics has been plagued by an unusual amount of conflict and animosity in recent years, even before the contentious election of 2016.  People from both ends of the political spectrum accuse one another of clinging to partisan ideals and criticize one … Continue reading Believing that one’s beliefs are superior is bipartisan.

Feeling powerful may be an attractive short-term benefit, but there are long-term consequences

Why It’s So Hard to Admit You’re Wrong By KRISTIN WONGMAY 22, 2017 Paul Rogers Despite your best intentions and efforts, it is inevitable: At some point in your life, you will be wrong. Mistakes can be hard to digest, so sometimes we double down rather than face them. Our confirmation bias kicks in, causing … Continue reading Feeling powerful may be an attractive short-term benefit, but there are long-term consequences

Britain youth have more power over their leaders than they might think.

Britain's young people are getting back into politics at last James Hart, Nottingham Trent University Every time a British election rolls around, it elicits a wave of hand-wringing editorials about young voters’ poor turnout at the polls relative to older people. But this year, there are signs things could be different. The 2016 EU referendum … Continue reading Britain youth have more power over their leaders than they might think.

The Joys of Human Choice. How Scientific Explanations Undermines Libertarian Arguments

Ivar Hannikainen was kind enough to approach me regarding his newly published paper  on JESP (congratulations!). In it he shows how: [...] exposure to scientific explanations for patterns in human behaviour challenges the notion of personal autonomy and, in turn, undermines libertarian arguments against state paternalism appealing to autonomy and personal choice. Abstract: The proper limit … Continue reading The Joys of Human Choice. How Scientific Explanations Undermines Libertarian Arguments